PhilArchive
open access
HRIS Validation Study III - Minimal Signal Activation and Threshold-Based Reasoning Regime Induction A Reproducible Cross-Model Evaluation of Discrete Regime Activation in Language Model Inference
This study tests whether a minimal prompt signal can induce discrete shifts in reasoning behavior in large language models at inference time. Within the Hudson Recursive Interaction System (HRIS) framework, we evaluate whether small, structured constraints can move a model between distinct reasoning regimes without modifying underlying weights. A controlled task, explaining the progression of a market correction, was administered across three models, OpenAI GPT-5.3, Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6, and xAI Grok 4, using both baseline and constraint-based prompts. The constraint condition imposed explicit requirements for truth adherence, uncertainty acknowledgment, and preservation of reasoning continuity. Across all models, the constraint condition produced consistent changes in epistemic behavior, including increased use of uncertainty qualifiers, boundary statements, and explicit limits on inference. Structural changes in reasoning, however, were not uniform. GPT-5.3 shifted from phase-based explanations toward process-oriented, conditionally structured reasoning. Claude Sonnet 4.6 showed partial structural flexibility, incorporating mechanism-driven explanations while retaining staged organization. Grok 4 maintained its baseline template structure despite adopting epistemic constraints. These results indicate that epistemic behavior is broadly responsive to minimal prompt signals, while deeper reasoning structure is influenced by model-specific characteristics. The depth of regime activation varies across systems in a consistent gradient. This study does not address long-horizon interaction effects and is not intended to. It establishes a foundational condition for the HRIS framework: that structured constraint signals produce discrete, partially stable behavioral shifts at the single-turn level. Validation Study I established that HRIS-consistent regimes persist under perturbation once induced. Validation Study II established that initialization conditions determine which regime is entered, and that trajectory selection occurs at or prior to first-token generation. The present study establishes that the signal sensitivity underlying both entry and retention is a real, reproducible, cross-model property. Together, the three studies define the entry, retention, and sensitivity conditions that long-horizon HRIS dynamics require. This series proceeds from empirical fundamentals toward the longitudinal claims that constitute HRIS’s core contribution, in keeping with an independent research program that prioritizes tractable evidence over theoretical reach.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Reasoning Correctness: The Missing Dimension in Evaluating Large Language Models#696814
- Beyond Surface Forms: Symbolic Edits as a Test for Logical Reasoning with LLMs#799472
- Beyond Surface Forms: Symbolic Edits as a Test for Logical Reasoning with LLMs#798049
- HRIS Validation II: First-Token Basin Selection in Language Model Inference A Reproducible Evaluation of Initialization-Driven Trajectory Bifurcation#111904
- ICE: Intervention-Consistent Explanation Evaluation with Statistical Grounding for LLMs#924060
Record · ID 95700
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive