OpenAlex
metadata only
CC BY 4.0
Bridging the accountability gap of artificial intelligence – what can be learned from Roman law?
Abstract This paper discusses the accountability gap problem posed by artificial intelligence. After sketching out the accountability gap problem we turn to ancient Roman law and scrutinise how slave-run businesses dealt with the accountability gap through an indirect agency of slaves. Our analysis
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Ethical AI is Impossible#82829
- More Human Than All Too Human: Challenges in Machine Ethics for Humanity Becoming a Spacefaring Civilization#77343
- An Overview of Artificial Intelligence Ethics#679428
- From Algorithmic Error to Legal Deception: Redefining Responsibility in the Employment of Artificial Intelligence (A Case Study of the Atrocity at Shajareh Tayyebeh School in Minab)#286881
- PHRONESIS — On Power Without Domination#79722
Record · ID 964300
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive