OpenAlex
metadata only
CC BY 4.0
Beware the Lure of Narratives: “Hungry Judges” Should Not Motivate the Use of “Artificial Intelligence” in Law
Abstract The “hungry judge” effect, as presented by a famous study, is a common point of reference to underline human bias in judicial decision-making. This is particularly pronounced in the literature on “artificial intelligence” (AI) in law. Here, the effect is invoked to counter concerns about bi
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Artificial Intelligence and the Transformation of Humans, Law and Technology Interactions in Judicial Proceedings#964283
- AI Jurisprudence: Toward Automated Justice#1178091
- Judicial Politics and Decisionmaking: A New Approach#1019683
- Court Review: Journal of the American Judges Association, Vol. 61, No. 2#420094
- AI Literacy for Legal AI Systems: a Practical Approach#1178614
Record · ID 964383
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive