OpenAlex
metadata only
CC BY 4.0
Automated Justice: Issues, Benefits and Risks in the Use of Artificial Intelligence and Its Algorithms in Access to Justice and Law Enforcement
computer-sciencecontext-archaeologyfield-mathematicslaw-enforcementpolitical-sciencetransparency-behavior
Abstract The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the field of law has generated many hopes. Some have seen it as a way of relieving courts’ congestion, facilitating investigations, and making sentences for certain offences more consistent—and therefore fairer. But while it is true that the work o
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Artificial Intelligence and the Transformation of Humans, Law and Technology Interactions in Judicial Proceedings#964283
- Artificial intelligence in judicial adjudication: Semantic biasness classification and identification in legal judgement (SBCILJ)#679208
- A General Overview of Artificial Intelligence and Its Current Implications in Civil Law#1176667
- Revolutionary Civil Procedure Law in the Development of Artificial Intelligence#1176465
- Revolutionary Civil Procedure Law in the Development of Artificial Intelligence#1176462
Record · ID 964454
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive