ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Histoacryl™ vs. Suture for Mesh Fixation in Lichtenstein Hernioplasty: A Randomized Prospective Double-Blinded Study
This is a prospective, randomized double-blinded study to find out if mesh fixation with n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (NBCA) are more painless than conventional mesh fixation with sutures in inguinal hernia operation (Lichtenstein procedure) in day-case surgery. Our hypothesis is that glue fixation is safe, simple and fast method compared to conventional Lichtenstein technique.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Mesh Fixation in Lichtenstein Hernioplasty#881863
- Effect of Suture for Mesh Fixation in Lichtenstein Hernia Repair#842331
- Absorbable Sutures , Non Absorbable Sutures or Biologic Fibrin Glue for Protesic Mesh Fixing in Lichtenstein Technique for Primitive Groin Hernia Repair: a Randomized Prospective Multicentric Trial#887550
- Suture Repair vs Mesh Repair in the Treatment of Incarcerated Groin Hernia in Elderly Populations#915159
- Coronally Advanced Flap With Alloderm Versus Coronally Advanced Flap With Micro-needling on RT1 Gingival Recession#1046185
Record · ID 966307
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive