ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Treatment Of Supracondylar Fractures Closed Reduction And Circular Ring External Fixation Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation
Patients treated with circular external fixation will have better outcomes (as measured by range of motion (ROM), alignment, outcome surveys) than those treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF).
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- PENURUNAN SKALA NYERI PADA PASIEN POST OPEN REDUCTIONAL INTERNAL FIXATION MENGGUNAKAN RELAKSASI NAFAS DALAM DAN TERAPI MUSIK#1003148
- Surgical Treatment Versus Non-surgical Treatment of Ulnar Fractures#880954
- Simultaneous vs. Postponed Carpal Tunnel Release (CTR) During Distal Radius Fracture (DRF) Fixation.#803682
- Management of Type 1 Supracondylar Humeral Fractures#894137
- Type II Supracondylar Fractures in Children#1103319
Record · ID 969255
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive