PhilArchive
open access
Causation and the is-ought gap
In this paper, I begin with Joseph Raz’s remarks on H.L.A. Hart’s contribution to general philosophy, before proposing a counterexample to the is-ought gap.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Statistical Evidence, Normalcy, and the Gatecrasher Paradox#702001
- Does ‘Ought’ Imply ‘Can’ from an Epistemic Point of View?#754206
- Reasons As Evidence Against Ought-Nots#747782
- Revisiting McKay and Johnson's counterexample to ( _β_)#753147
- Transmission Failure, AGM Style#710444
Record · ID 96947
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive