HAL (France)open access
Using an open science checklist in grant proposal reviews to predict reproducibility of funded publications
Grant proposals, Open science, Reproducibility, Peer review, 0, Predictive accuracy, Funders
This document is indexed with metadata only — full text is not available in the archive for this record.
Open the official source ↗
Record · ID 971008
Retrieved via
Conceptio — every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.