HAL (France)
open access
Discomfort of noninvasive ventilation, high flow nasal cannula oxygen, and conventional oxygen implemented after extubation in non-COPD patients
Discomfort of noninvasive respiratory supports remain controversial. In the present study, the discomfort of high flow nasal cannula oxygen, noninvasive ventilation, and conventional oxygen therapy were evaluated in the post-extubation period.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Effect of Postextubation High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs Noninvasive Ventilation in Patients With Hypercapnic COPD#1113003
- Conventional Low Flow Oxygenation Versus High Flow Nasal Cannula in Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure#897931
- Postextubation Management in Patients at Risk for Extubation Failure#911225
- High-flow Nasal Cannula Therapy for Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)#876501
- Identifying the Best Flow Setting Strategy for High-Flow Nasal Cannula#804818
Record · ID 971119
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive