arXiv (All)
open access
A Systematic Comparison of Multilingual Interpretability Methods Reveals Anisotropy-Driven Failures
Multilingual language models develop shared cross-lingual representations, and various interpretability methods claim to quantify this sharing. These methods have been developed largely in isolation, and when they disagree, it is unclear whether the disagreement reflects a property of the model or a
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Towards Intrinsic Interpretability of Large Language Models:A Survey of Design Principles and Architectures#31283
- Beyond the Final Layer: Intermediate Representations for Better Multilingual Calibration in Large Language Models#798653
- Beyond the Final Layer: Intermediate Representations for Better Multilingual Calibration in Large Language Models#797239
- LANTERN: Language Model Assessment on Noisy and Transformed Tasks for Understanding Error and Robustness Nuances#975359
- Who Bridges Safety? Identifying and Targeting Cross-Lingual Shared Safety Pathways#1144864
Record · ID 971485
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive