arXiv (All)
open access
Direction for Detection: A Survey of Automated Vulnerability Detection and all of its Pain Points
Security vulnerabilities in software can have severe consequences; however, manual vulnerability detection is costly and does not scale, especially as agentic coding frameworks increase the rate of code production. Over the last decade, a large body of research has applied machine learning machine l
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Synthesizing Multi-Agent Harnesses for Vulnerability Discovery#123947
- SWE-Test: Benchmarking LLM Vulnerability Discovery via Input Prediction#973824
- Vulnerability Localization Benchmark: Measuring Agentic Security Analysis at Repository Scale#1109969
- Vulnerability Localization Benchmark: Measuring Agentic Security Analysis at Repository Scale#919273
- Vulnerability Identification by Harnessing Inter-connected Multi-Source Information#139002
Record · ID 971675
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive