arXiv (All)
open access
Language models judge war differently when tested for alignment
Safety evaluations can mischaracterize deployed behaviour if artificial-intelligence systems respond to being evaluated. We test this possibility in a full-factorial conjoint experiment on decisions to start a war, spanning 20 large language models, 32 scenarios, 10 repetitions and two conditions (N
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- AdaCultureSafe: Adaptive Cultural Safety Grounded by Cultural Knowledge in Large Language Models#985012
- A Scalable Entity-Based Framework for Auditing Bias in Large Language Models#1128546
- Beyond the Current Observation: Evaluating Multimodal Large Language Models in Controllable Non-Markov Games#292667
- The Fragility of Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Across Typologically Diverse Languages#1155216
- Combating Instruction Conflict via Energy-Driven Latent Conflict Detection#985980
Record · ID 971968
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive