arXiv (All)
open access
How do LLMs Evaluate Perceived Moral Agency? Investigating Moral Decision-Making in Human-Artificial Agents Interactions
As LLMs take on roles requiring moral advice, understanding how they attribute moral agency becomes critical. Humans possess moral agency, the capacity to make ethically guided decisions and bear responsibility for their consequences, a well-established construct in moral psychology. Yet as artifici
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Artificial Moral Agency: Autonomy and Evolution#80104
- People Accurately Anticipate the Influence of Human and LLM Moral Advice#223236
- Can LLMs Imagine Moral Alternatives Beyond Binary Dilemmas?#820538
- Beyond the Human Loop: Resonance Eligibility as the Structural Basis for Moral Inclusion#106229
- Taking Artificial Intelligences Seriously: The Grounds of Well-Being and Obligations to Artificial Moral Patients#75136
Record · ID 971992
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive