arXiv (All)
open access
Beyond Aggregate Scores: Behavioral Correctness Assumptions for Assessing Reference-Based Automatic Evaluation Methods
Automated reference-based evaluation methods play a critical role in assessing natural language generation systems. Existing meta-evaluation primarily measures agreement with human judgments or benchmark labels, providing limited insight into evaluator behavior under controlled conditions. We introd
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Evaluating the Evaluator: Summarization Metrics and LLM-Judges beyond English#923998
- Evaluating the Evaluator: Summarization Metrics and LLM-Judges beyond English#919769
- When Does Memory Help? A Cost-Aware Evaluation of Long-Term Memory in Tool-Using LLM Agents#972506
- How Do LLMs Cite? A Mechanistic Interpretation of Attribution in Retrieval-Augmented Generation#1048329
- TRACE: Single-Pass Decoding-Trace Risk Localization for Generation Calibration#1129977
Record · ID 972225
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive