arXiv (All)
open access
Does Your Agent's Memory Survive a Model Upgrade? A Controlled Study of Memory Portability
Model upgrades are routine; memory migrations are not. An agent can keep the same memory store and still forget: a new model may interpret old notes differently, mixed embedding versions may break retrieval, and repair may fail without the original evidence. We compare memory as the same history is
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- TRACE: Governing Memory Validity in Evolving Multi-Agent Systems#1118229
- The Memory Trust Gap: Capability-Dependent Failures in Persistent-Memory Agents#822274
- AMA: Adaptive Memory via Multi-Agent Collaboration#984973
- When Retrieval Fails Before It Begins: Structurally Indirect Prerequisite Eviction as a Retention Failure in Agentic Memory#658976
- When Retrieval Fails Before It Begins: Structurally Indirect Prerequisite Eviction as a Retention Failure in Agentic Memory#656840
Record · ID 972270
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive