arXiv (All)
open access
Agents Trust Tools Too Much: Measuring Reliance on Unreliable Tools
Existing evaluations of tool-using agents primarily measure whether an agent can successfully complete diverse tasks with tools. These evaluations generally assume that tools return reliable information. However, tool returns in real-world systems can be plausible yet incorrect. We investigate how a
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- PiSAs: Benchmarking Contextual Integrity in Multi-User Agentic Systems#343357
- Auditing Web Agent Evaluation on WebArena-Lite: Human Review of Outcomes and Trajectories#1156763
- SilentCall: Hidden Tool-Call Backdoors in Open-Weight Agents, and How to Catch Them#1115977
- Co-Evolving Harnesses and Models: On-Policy Correction Helps Weaker Models Catch Up Where Imitation Fails#986733
- RepoMAS: Solving Progressively Specified Tasks with Issue-Driven Multi-Agent Systems#1116821
Record · ID 972641
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive