arXiv (All)
open access
When Agents Disagree: The Selection Bottleneck in Multi-Agent LLM Pipelines
Multi-agent LLM pipelines produce contradictory evidence on whether team diversity improves output quality: heterogeneous Mixture-of-Agents teams outperform single models, yet homogeneous Self-MoA teams consistently win under synthesis-based aggregation. We propose a resolution by identifying the se
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Testing Interchangeability in LLM Agent Teams#972215
- Multi-agent Scaling Across Disjunctive and Compensatory Tasks#1106262
- MAGIC: Mixed-Granularity Agent Graphs via Incremental Construction with Dense-Reward Reinforcement Learning#1062554
- MAGIC: Mixed-Granularity Agent Graphs via Incremental Construction with Dense-Reward Reinforcement Learning#1043086
- You're Hired: Strategic Model Selection for LLM Collaboration#1143417
Record · ID 973096
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive