arXiv (All)
open access
AgentFairBench: Do LLM Agents Discriminate When They Act?
Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly take actions (screening applicants, recommending credit, triaging patients), yet fairness for LLMs is still measured by grading answers. We introduce AgentFairBench, a cheap, reproducible, multi-domain benchmark for demographic disparity in the actions
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- GPTBIAS: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating Bias in Large Language Models#924392
- GPTBIAS: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating Bias in Large Language Models#920161
- AnyAct: Universal Action for Self-Evolving Agents#1132226
- MiniRep: Robust Reputation-Based Aggregation for Multi-Agent Debate#1144264
- Pretraining and adapting a language model on a dependency-free stack: GPT-2 124M from random weights, reproduced against llm.c, and a clinical adapter for Qwen3-0.6B#1076224
Record · ID 973222
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive