arXiv (All)
open access
When Text Misleads: Inconsistent-Aware Reasoning for Audio-Grounded Dialogue
Understanding spoken dialogue requires joint reasoning over lexical content and paralinguistic acoustic signals such as emotion and conversational intent. However, existing evaluations often allow shortcuts based on transcripts or single-modality solutions, obscuring whether models genuinely ground
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Using Semantic Uncertainty to Estimate Transition Relevance in Turn-taking#998508
- Advancing Automated Speaking Assessment Leveraging Multifaceted Relevance and Grammar Information#1070686
- Conversation as data: Extracting features from naturalistic conversation datasets#1108174
- Conversation as data: Extracting features from naturalistic conversation datasets#1108120
- ER-EDF: A Psychology-Grounded Emotion Regulation Framework for Speech Empathetic Dialogue Generation in Large Audio-Language Models#1084976
Record · ID 973357
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive