arXiv (All)
open access
When Can Conditional Flow Matching Replace Pointwise Negative Log-Likelihood?
Flow matching enables likelihood-free training, yet alignment methods increasingly reuse conditional flow matching (CFM) losses as endpoint negative log-likelihoods (NLLs) and their old/new differences as log-likelihood ratios. We characterize when these substitutions are valid. For linear Gaussian
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Beyond the Manifold Hypothesis: Hybrid Spectral Parameterizations for Flow Matching#1116763
- Prediction--Loss Alignment for Sampler--Robust Flow Matching Training#998105
- Faster Inference of Flow-Based Generative Models via Improved Data-Noise Coupling#1129199
- Steepest Guidance: A Practical and Principled Approach to Inference-Time Alignment of Flow and Diffusion-based Models#1144058
- Discriminative Flow Matching: Beyond Time-Conditioning in Generative Restoration via Flow-State Representations#927808
Record · ID 973362
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive