arXiv (All)
open access
More Than Mimicking Reviewers: Evaluating LLMs for Pre-Submission Peer Review
Peer-review feedback often arrives too late for authors to make meaningful revisions. We study an author-facing LLM system that moves part of this stress test before submission: it generates a broad pool of atomic concerns and compresses them into a short report. We evaluate agreement with historica
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Peer review: historical evolution and reviewers' learning.#220934
- Peer Review at Capacity: An editor's view#798403
- Peer Review at Capacity: An editor's view#796990
- Inefficiency and inequity of the law review submission system.#285192
- The Privilege and Power of Peer Review: Advancing Science With Integrity, Vigilance and Fairness.#448623
Record · ID 973418
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive