arXiv (All)
open access
Solving versus Verifying: Catching Contradictions in Tax Reasoning Systems
Large language models now compute correct tax liabilities on over 90% of well-formed cases in statutory benchmarks, which makes them candidates for the tax-advisory and compliance systems that consume such an answer directly. Real legal inputs, however, are frequently defective: required facts are m
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Trivalent Semantics for Conditional Obligations#80874
- Error analysis and interlanguage#207269
- Wondering about the Impossible: On the Semantics of Counterpossibles#90830
- The General Strong Evoluist Structural Alternative: A Composition and Back-Reflection Theorem#695113
- Semantic Criteria of Correct Formalization#747114
Record · ID 973543
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive