arXiv (All)
open access
Protocol Compression Changes Which Party Pays: Bilateral Cost in Cross-Organization LLM Agent Communication
Agents that talk across organizations exchange long messages billed by the token. A shorter notation therefore looks like a saving that costs nothing but an agreement to use it. Recent work reports the saving is conditional. Compressed notation can instead raise total tokens by 8% to 11% over a JSON
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Beyond Token Savings: A Systematic Study of Context Compression in LLM Agents#1117673
- A Non-constant Lower Bound for Grammar-Based Compression with Greedy#1000075
- The Structure of Quantization Damage in LLMs: Why the Next Bit Should Be Spent Globally#627672
- Position Matters: Feature Inversion Attacks in ViT Split Inference with Token Reduction and Shuffling#821188
- Do LLMs Overthink Basic Math Reasoning? Benchmarking the Accuracy-Efficiency Tradeoff in Language Models#160912
Record · ID 973735
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive