arXiv (All)
open access
QUACK! Making the (Rubber) Ducky Talk: A Systematic Study of Keystroke Dynamics for HID Injection Detection
Modern computing systems implicitly trust human input devices, allowing USB Human Interface Device (HID) emulators, such as the USB Rubber Ducky, to inject arbitrary keystrokes while bypassing conventional defenses. Speed- and regularity-based heuristics are easily evaded through slower or randomize
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- QUACK! Making the (Rubber) Ducky Talk: A Systematic Study of Keystroke Dynamics for HID Injection Detection#31206
- Et Tu, MacBook? Unprivileged Keystroke Inference and Context Profiling via the Built-in IMU Side Channel#1035965
- Et Tu, MacBook? Unprivileged Keystroke Inference and Context Profiling via the Built-in IMU Side Channel#1006789
- Rendering on Real Silicon: GPU Render-Timing as a Passive, AI-Resistant CAPTCHA Signal#405575
- Blind Spots in the Guard: How Domain-Camouflaged Injection Attacks Evade Detection in Multi-Agent LLM Systems#216729
Record · ID 974385
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive