arXiv (All)
open access
Compliance vs. Sensibility: On the Reasoning Controllability in Large Language Models
Large Language Models (LLMs) acquire reasoning capabilities through shared inference patterns in pre-training data, which are further elicited via Chain-of-Thought (CoT). However, whether fundamental reasoning patterns, such as induction, deduction, and abduction, can be decoupled from specific prob
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- AI Assistants Overassist#1078927
- How Deep Can LLMs Learn to Reason? Expressiveness Is Key#1117395
- The Table Says Otherwise: Testing LLMs with Counterfactual Relational Data#792774
- The Table Says Otherwise: Testing LLMs with Counterfactual Relational Data#788774
- Frontier LLMs are effective batch optimizers: Assessing reasoning models in continuous and discrete settings#925539
Record · ID 974398
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive