arXiv (All)
open access
RAG over Thinking Traces Can Improve Reasoning Tasks
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has proven effective for knowledge-intensive tasks, but is widely believed to offer limited benefit for reasoning-intensive problems such as math and code generation. We challenge this assumption by showing that the limitation lies not in RAG itself, but in the c
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Assessing the Promise and Pitfalls of ChatGPT for Automated CS1-Driven Code Generation#1141217
- Adaptive Critical Token-Aware Retrieval for Repository-Level Code Generation#627717
- Guided Learning with an AI Tutor: Pedagogical Support in Introductory Programming#309518
- CRANE: Constrained Reasoning Injection for Code Agents via Nullspace Editing#187384
- Beyond-RAG: Question Identification and Answer Generation in Real-Time Conversations#821672
Record · ID 974407
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive