arXiv (All)
open access
PRISM: A Multi-Dimensional Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Peer Reviewers
The rapid growth in submissions to machine learning venues has strained the scientific peer-review system and intensified interest in LLM-based automated peer reviewers. However, how good these systems are actually, especially compared to human reviewers at catching scientific gaps, remains poorly u
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Judging a Review by its Cover: A Reliability Analysis of LLM-based Peer Review Evaluation Metrics#1049008
- ActReview: Rebuttal-Guided Training Data and Rubric Rewards for Actionable Peer Review Generation#986680
- Beyond Final Decisions: A Process-Centric Benchmark for Transparent AI-Assisted Peer Review#973562
- Who's Keeping Score? Interactive Steering of LLM-Powered Scoring with Attune#612387
- Who's Keeping Score? Interactive Steering of LLM-Powered Scoring with Attune#610910
Record · ID 974435
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive