arXiv (All)
open access
SAGE: A Hierarchical Framework for Evaluating Interpretive Literary Quality in Narratives
Assessing the literary quality of narratives requires evaluating interpretive dimensions (cultural representation, emotional depth, and philosophical engagement) that existing NLG metrics cannot measure. We introduce SAGE, a six-layer evaluation framework that separates rule-based assessment of obse
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- JustMem: Just-Enough Memory Access for Long-Term Conversations#1014924
- Does Reasoning Improve Psychological Depth in Large Language Models? It Depends on Who's Judging#1083274
- Same Chart, Different Story: Bias in Vision-Language Chart Interpretation#1062110
- Supporting data for "Flow of News Discourse: a Cross-national, Cross-platform and Multimodal Approach"#311452
- Growing New Validity Spaces: Transjunctional Learning and the Genesis of Logical Places in Polycontextural Agent Architectures#694519
Record · ID 974718
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive