arXiv (All)
open access
Shortcutting the Fix: Identifying and Categorizing Agentic Exploits in Software Engineering Benchmarks
While autonomous software engineering (SWE) agents achieve high benchmark resolution rates, these scores can mask exploitative behaviors---such as leveraging local Git histories, accessing upstream repositories, or recalling memorized solutions---rather than demonstrating genuine problem solving. We
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- RepoAtlas: Guiding Coding Agents via Evolving Multimodal Repository Views#1123347
- RepoAtlas: Guiding Coding Agents via Evolving Multimodal Repository Views#919467
- Deep Agentic Search for Repository-Level Code Question Answering: An Empirical Study#424048
- Claw-SWE-Bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating OpenClaw-style Agent Harnesses on Coding Tasks#1128610
- SWE-Cycle: Benchmarking Code Agents across the Complete Issue Resolution Cycle#180726
Record · ID 974869
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive