arXiv (All)
open access
Optimising Metamath Proofs for Human Working Memory
Mathematical proofs vary in legibility. While most proof optimisation techniques seek to minimise proof size, the strategic reordering of inferences can reduce the working memory demand of proof checking without altering overall size. Metamath serves as a prime case study for this approach: its veri
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The principles of judicial proof as given by logic, psychology, and general experience, and illustrated in judicial trials;#198869
- Riemann, Metatheory, and Proof, Rev.3#79278
- The long-term viability of team reasoning#116536
- Crítica de La "Axiomática Metafísica" de L. Polo Según J. F. Sellés#77771
- Two Informational Theories of Memory: a case from Memory-Conjunction Errors#717031
Record · ID 975159
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive