arXiv (All)
open access
The Oversight Gap: What LLM Safety Monitors Miss, and Why It Is Not Capability
Several properties safety monitors are asked to certify, among them cross-tenant noninterference, sandbagging and evaluation awareness, are 2-safety hyperproperties, witnessed only by two executions. The standard consequence is a binary impossibility: one trace cannot decide them. We replace the bin
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Safety in Self-Evolving LLM Agent Systems: Threats, Amplification, and Case Studies#299821
- ContainmentBench: Trace-Based Evaluation of Post-Injection Containment in Tool-Using LLM Agents#405550
- BRA-Audit: Budgeted Runtime Auditing for LLM Multi-Agent Systems via Cumulative-Exposure Audit-Point Placement#609105
- HarmProfile: Characterizing Harmful Distributions in Frontier LLMs#610079
- HarmProfile: Characterizing Harmful Distributions in Frontier LLMs#609017
Record · ID 975218
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive