NCBI PubMed Central
open access
The effect of manuscript characteristics on quality assessment of scientific manuscripts in psychology.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Changes In Scientific Publishing: A Heuristic For Analysis#657602
- Nursing faculty's experiences of publication stress and research integrity: a phenomenological study in Jordan universities.#263174
- The impact of ChatGPT on orthopedic residents' scientific writing: A quasi-experimental study.#320531
- Who is more likely to make causal claims in observational studies? The role of author experience, team size, cultural background, and gender in scientific framing.#449708
- Tips for quality publishing; lessons from the neuroscience editorial team.#30717
Record · ID 975543
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive