OpenAlex
metadata only
Parsing Argumentation Structures in Persuasive Essays
In this article, we present a novel approach for parsing argumentation structures. We identify argument components using sequence labeling at the token level and apply a new joint model for detecting argumentation structures. The proposed model globally optimizes argument component types and argumen
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Exploring the Potential of Large Language Models in Computational Argumentation#679244
- TimeThink: Eliciting Compositional Reasoning in Timeseries Large Language Models#1071243
- UniBuc at SemEval-2024 Task 2: Tailored Prompting with Solar for Clinical NLI#1155343
- Extra-Syntactic Subject Positions in Japanese Discourse: A Minimal Four-Layer Model#732380
- Argument Structure Prediction in Online Conversations: A Comparative Study of Modeling Paradigms and Task Architectures#1144192
Record · ID 976443
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive