Thant v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, fct, 2026fc1163, 2026 fc 1163 (canlii), 2026, fc, 1163, (canlii), imm-6306-25, 2026, administrative law, judicial review, reasonableness, vavilov framework, whether decision was transparent, intelligible, and justified, internally coherent and rational chain of analysis, deferential but robust review applied, request to reweigh evidence rejected, application for judicial review dismissed, citizenship and immigration, work permits, international mobility program, start, up business visa stream, whether refusal of early work permit under paragraph 200(1)(b) of the immigration and refugee protection regulations was reasonable, purpose inconsistent with temporary stay assessed, need to leave canada at end of authorised stay considered, refusal upheld, application dismissed, citizenship and immigration, work permits, employment offer information, whether apparent oversight of imm 5802 employment offer details rendered refusal unreasonable, “apparent misstatement” treated as peripheral, error not sufficiently central or significant shortcoming under vavilov, refusal turned on other findings, application dismissed, citizenship and immigration, work permits, business plan and designated entity materials, whether officer reasonably found no urgent need for early physical presence in canada for a digital venture, business plan and due diligence report lacked particularised explanation, officer not bound by designated entity assessment (maghami v canada (citizenship and immigration)), refusal reasonable, application dismissed, citizenship and immigration, work permits, reasons and gcms notes, whether phrase “[t]he applicant, or their representative” showed unreasonable doubt about who was applying, gcms notes read fairly as not suggesting doubts, argument rejected, reasonableness challenge not established, application dismissed