PsyArXiv
metadata only
Blending Sources of Evidence: Meta-Analysis Combining Aggregated Data and Individual Participant Data from Multilab Replications
Conventional meta-analyses synthesize average treatment effects from sample-level aggregated data (AD) and are limited to addressing questions of moderation only at the sample level. Although associations between study-mean covariates and effect sizes need not reflect individual-level relations, ind
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Blending Sources of Evidence: Meta-Analysis Combining Aggregated Data and Individual Participant Data from Multilab Replications#976825
- Effect of Emphasizing Methodological Limitations of Primary Studies in a Systematic Review Summary: Findings from Two Randomized Controlled Trials#276853
- Insights into systematic reviews and meta-analyses: Are we judgmental enough?#371404
- Meta-Research Evidence for Evaluating Therapies#735237
- Can fluoxetine’s diminished efficacy in pediatric depression be explained by study sites, baseline severity, age, and psychological interventions? A secondary exploratory meta-regression.#316600
Record · ID 976717
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive