OSF
open access
Guidance for defining outcomes in clinical trials
biostatisticsepidemiologymedicine-and-health-sciencesphysical-sciences-and-mathematicspublic-healthstatistics-and-probability
Defining outcomes completely before conducting clinical trials helps to mitigate reporting biases; however, there is limited guidance to help investigators define outcomes completely. We aimed to develop a structured approach for defining trial outcomes completely and consistently. We reviewed liter
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
OSF
Related documents
- Uncertainty and novel clinical trial designs in oncology - when should equipoise matter?#1158604
- Randomized Controlled Trials: How Can We Know “What Works”?#712542
- Developing Guidelines for the Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials in Real-World Settings#344912
- INvestigating DIGital Outcomes in the Community#892947
- Failures in Clinical Trials in the European Union: Lessons from the Polish Experience#776209
Record · ID 976864 · SHA-256 185604818b2f43ba
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive