OSF
open access
Credit, recognition, and reward for non-traditional research artefacts in the Life Sciences
Publication metrics remain the primary academic performance assessment in modern academia. This focus has fostered the publish or perish culture, negatively impacting research output quantity and quality. Consequently, a gap exists in the recognition and reward of impactful non-traditional research
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
OSF
Related documents
- Mapping responsible conduct in the uncharted field of research-creation: a scoping review#97754
- Epistemic politics of research funding: a social network analysis of knowledge production#669907
- The Scientific Contribution Graph: Automated Literature-based Technological Roadmapping at Scale#821448
- Adapt or perish? Assessing the recent shift in the European research funding arena from ‘ELSA’ to ‘RRI’#774657
- Metrics in research impact assessment and grant funding: Insights from researchers in the “Reviewer 2 Must Be Stopped!” Facebook group#105511
Record · ID 976873 · SHA-256 185604818b2f43ba
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive