OSF
open access
Overcoming essentialism: evaluation of theories of consciousness by the lawful regularities they predict
cognitive-psychologyconsciousnessphilosophy-of-sciencesocial-and-behavioral-sciencestheory-and-philosophy-of-science
A common objection to consciousness research is that researchers cannot agree on what consciousness is. But how should a consensus on the nature of consciousness be reached? Does consciousness have essential features that one can be right or wrong about? Should we select theories of consciousness ba
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
OSF
Related documents
- Can lists of requirements help consciousness navigate its epistemological quandaries?#73050
- Theories of Consciousness: Constraints, Commitments, and Complementarity#79511
- Progress in Understanding Consciousness? Easy and Hard Problems, and Philosophical and Empirical Perspectives#97854
- Do Mechanisms Matter for Inferences about Consciousness?#705229
- The Primary Pitfalls on the Road to Understanding Consciousness#691635
Record · ID 977011 · SHA-256 181194287ca0a0b3
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive