SocArXiv
metadata only
The Constructed Indicator: A Practitioner’s Perspective on Interpreting QS Citations per Faculty
This Letter examines how the design of the QS Citations per Faculty (CPF) indicator shapes institutional interpretation and use, from a practitioner perspective. Drawing on experience in the data-checking cycle, it shows how citation rules, faculty denominators, and damping mechanisms can complicate
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Using Citation Analysis Techniques for Computer-Assisted Legal Research in Continental Jurisdictions#679181
- Citation Practices of Contrasting Cultures in Q1 Journal Articles#194180
- Modernizing the Institutional Review Board Process for Implementation Science - A Narrative Review of Barriers and Ethical Considerations.#615732
- Against Moral Panic and Citation Fiction: A Critique of "Panem, Corticoids and Circenses" and a Proposal for Editorial Gatekeeping on Reference Integrity.#1097
- Are Users of Digital Archives Ready for the AI Era? Obstacles to the Application of Computational Research Methods and New Opportunities#1146640
Record · ID 977344
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive