PhilArchive
open access
Why we go wrong: beyond Kant’s dichotomy between duty and self-love
Kant holds that whenever we fail to act from duty, we are driven by self-love. In this paper, we argue that there are a variety of different ways in which people go wrong, and we show why it is unsatisfying to reduce all of these to self-love. In doing so, we present Kant with five cases of wrongdoing that are difficult to account for in terms of self-love. We end by suggesting a possible fix for Kant, arguing that he should either accept a pluralistic account of self-love, or move beyond the duty/self-love dichotomy entirely.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Do Good People Love Themselves? On Rational Self-love in Kant#73253
- A5's Black Swan: Frankfurt, Oikeiôsis, and Hamilton's Rule: Searching for a Person Who Loves No One, and Finding That A5 Was Never One Variable#709136
- La autorización de la razón teórica y los fines naturales en Kant#72498
- Free Will vs. Free Choice in Aquinas’ _De Malo_#110775
- Necessitation, Constraint, and Reluctant Action: Obligation in Wolff, Baumgarten, and Kant#86200
Record · ID 97783
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive