ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Double-Blind Comparison of Combined General-Spinal Anesthesia to General Anesthesia for Coronary Artery Surgery
Use of neuraxial agents in anesthesia for cardiac surgery is expanding. We have used combined general-spinal anesthesia for cardiac surgery for 12 years. We hypothesized that compared to general anesthesia, the combined techniques would provide comparable intraoperative hemodynamics and improved postoperative analgesia. This study subjected these techniques to a double-blind randomized trial.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Impact of Ultrasound-Guided Spinal Anesthesia#916627
- Cyclopol on Electrophysiological Monitoring During Spine Surgery: a Randomized Controlled, Noninferiority Study#870219
- Combined SAPB in MICS#888416
- Spinal Versus Caudal Analgesia After Pediatric Infra-umbilical Surgery#871419
- Analysis of Different Postoperative Analgesia Strategies Following Scoliosis Surgery#911360
Record · ID 979053
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive