ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Ejaculation Preserving Photoselective Vaporization Versus Plasma Kinetic Vaporization Versus Transurethral Resection Of The Prostate: A RCT
To Evaluate and compare the outcome and coast of ejaculation sparing management of BPH using 3 different techniques: PVP, PKVP and TURP. Ejaculation sparing TURP group is considered the standard control group. Evaluation will be carried out through a prospective randomized powered trial
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Clinical Trial on the Effectiveness of TUMT Compared to PAE in Reducing Severe LUTS in Men with BPH#894908
- Minimally Invasive Surgical Therapy for BPH#325211
- Faktor Minat Akseptor Vasektomi di Kecamatan Jekan Raya Kota Palangka Raya: Factors Influencing Vasectomy Acceptors in Jekan Raya District Palangka Raya City#274825
- Autologous Fat Grafting Beneath Penile Split Thickness Skin Graft Placement During Penile Reconstruction#870172
- Implanted Nitinol Device (iTind) System in Chinese Males With Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Secondary to BPH#812682
Record · ID 979271
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive