A Comparative Study of Three Ureteral Stenting Strategies After Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy for Upper Urinary Tract Calculi

In recent years, with the widespread popularization of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) concept, tubeless ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URL) has gradually become a research hotspot. Multiple studies have indicated that tubeless management may be safe and feasible for strictly selected low-risk patients, and can prevent stent-related complications. Nevertheless, high-quality three-arm controlled trial evidence is still lacking regarding whether complete tubeless management is applicable to all patients with conventional urolithiasis, and whether an optimal time window exists to balance safety and comfort when ureteral stenting is mandatory. Most existing studies only compare stenting versus non-stenting, or long-term versus short-term stenting, without systematic comparison of tubeless management, short-term stenting (1-week indwelling) and conventional stenting (2-week indwelling) within a unified framework. In summary, although URL techniques have matured, numerous uncertainties remain in postoperative ureteral stent management strategies. Rigorously designed prospective studies are urgently needed in clinical practice to comprehensively evaluate differences in complication control, patient quality of life (assessed by the Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire \[USSQ\]), unplanned readmission rates and health-economic costs among three management modalities: tubeless approach, stent removal at postoperative 1 week and stent removal at postoperative 2 weeks. This study aims to fill this evidence gap, provide high-level evidence-based medical references for urologists to develop individualized and precise postoperative ureteral stent management protocols, and ultimately achieve dual optimization of patients' recovery speed and quality of life.