ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
External Validation of the Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score in a Tunisian Population
This study aims to externally validate the Glasgow-Blatchford Score (GBS) in a Tunisian population presenting with non-traumatic upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Despite advances in endoscopic management, early risk stratification remains essential to guide clinical decision-making. In Tunisia, the routine hospitalization of all patients for observation presents a challenge, highlighting the need for reliable prognostic tools. The study is designed as a multicenter, descriptive, and analytical investigation across several emergency departments. Adult patients (≥16 years) will be included, with follow-up conducted at 30 days to assess for adverse outcomes including rebleeding, the need for hemostasis, complications, and mortality. Clinical and epidemiological data will be collected using a standardized form. Statistical analysis will evaluate the predictive performance of the GBS, focusing on sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for 30-day outcomes. The results are expected to determine whether GBS is a valid and useful tool for risk assessment in the Tunisian context, potentially aiding in more efficient and targeted patient management.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A New Risk Score for the Emergency Department in Patients With Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding#886614
- Machine Learning for Risk Stratification in the Emergency Department (MARS-ED)#907601
- Systematic Analysis of a Standardized Questionnaire to Detect Possible Bleeding Disorders and Its Impact on Perioperative Hemostasis Management#805654
- Hemostatic Powder Following Injection Therapy Versus Conventional Dual Therapy for Endoscopic Hemostasis for Non-variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding#917160
- Transfusion Requirements in Gastrointestinal (GI) Bleeding#682985
Record · ID 979832
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive