ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Assessment of Coronary Artery Lesion Using Optical Coherence Tomography Versus IntraVascular Ultrasound for BiorEsorbable Vascular Scaffold Implantation
The primary objective is to determine whether IVUS- (vs. OCT-) guided BVS implantation is non-inferior to achieve a large in-scaffold minimal lumen area (primary endpoint) measured by OCT at 1-year follow-up.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- High-Definition Intravascular Ultrasound versus Optical Coherence Tomography: Lumen Size and Plaque Morphology#249857
- Coronary Artery Healing and Bioresorbable Scaffold#1008393
- DOCTOR Compare - A Study in the "DOCTOR" Series (Does Optical Coherence Tomography Optimize Revascularization?"#827900
- OCT and Scaffold Embedding After NC Balloon#1096551
- IVI-guided Versus Angiography-guided PCI in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus#856532
Record · ID 980650
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive