ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Intrasinus and Extrasinus Approach for the Placement of Zygomatic Implants in Severely Resorbed Edentulous Maxillary Arch Using Zygomatic Success Code - An In-Vivo Study
Various approach has outlined in the literature but no clinical studies that have compared the intrasinus and extrasinus approach for the placement of zygomatic implants using zygomatic success code. The present study is planned to compare the intrasinus and extrasinus approach for the placement of zygomatic implant in severely resorbed edentulous maxillary arch using zygomatic success code.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Computer Guided Placement of Zygomatic Implants in Two Different Approaches#1125204
- Study of Hard and Soft Tissue Behavior Around Abutments on Implants.#843922
- Evaluation of Accuracy of Three-Dimensionally Guided Zygomatic Implant Installation#1128310
- Use of Specifically Designed Drills for Internal Sinus Lifting#1093012
- Loading Protocols for Dental Implants Placed in Healed Fully Edentulous Maxilla#806643
Record · ID 980836
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive