ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Dressing Materials of Donor Site of Split-thickness Skin Graft; Paraffin Mesh Gauze vs Povidone-Iodine Foam at SMBB Institute of Trauma Karachi
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if povidone-iodine foam dressing is better in achieving complete reepithelialization of donor site wounds after harvest of split-thickness skin graft as paraffin mesh gauze. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does povidone-iodine foam dressing promotes complete reepithelialization earlier in comparison? Which type of dressing will require fewer replacements? Which type of dressing material is associated with less pain? Non-probability consecutive sampling method will be used and participants divided in two groups. Donor site wounds after split-thickness skin graft harvest will be dressed using two different dressing materials. Participants will be followed until complete epithelialization with change of dressing on follow-ups if required. Complete epithelialization is usually achieved within two weeks.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Comparison of OASIS Wound Matrix With Approved Dressings for Skin Graft Donor Sites#813750
- Evaluation of the Use of Minced Skin Grafts for Promoting Donor Site Wound Healing After Split-Thickness Skin Grafting#981780
- An Investigation to Evaluate a New Donor Site Dressing in Surgical Burn Patients#830564
- A comparison of conventional skin graft donor site dressings and collagen dressing#341876
- Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of EASYEF® in Acute Wound (Split-thickness Skin Graft Donor Site)#877065
Record · ID 980862
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive