ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Thickness Map-Guided vs. Empirical PV Isolation Using Pulsed Field Ablation for Paroxysmal AF
This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing CT-guided versus empirical pulsed field ablation (PFA) for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. The study investigates whether atrial wall thickness-based energy titration improves arrhythmia outcomes compared to standard empirical ablation using the PulseSelect™ system.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Added Value of SVC Isolation in Patients With Pulmonary Vein Reconnection Undergoing Repeat Ablation for Recurrent Paroxysmal AF#870690
- Pulsed Field Ablation With Concomitant Radiofrequency Cardioneuroablation in Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation#905848
- Comparison of Two Pulmonary Vein Ablation Techniques for Persistent AF#1161875
- A Trial of High Power-Short Duration Versus Standard Power-Long Duration Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation#835432
- A Study on the Therapeutic Value of Additional Left Atrial Posterior Wall Isolation Guided by Voltage Mapping in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.#1103285
Record · ID 981170
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive