Duke Law Scholarship Repository
metadata only
LLM-Assisted Legal Propositions Identification from Party Arguments in the U.S. Supreme Court Briefs
artificial-intelligenceartificial-intelligence-and-roboticshuman-computer-interactionlegal-writing-and-researchunited-states-supreme-court
Merits briefs are central to U.S. litigation, serving as the primary means for parties to present arguments and persuade judges. Legal propositions in these merits briefs are the atomic units of arguments, whose relationships evolve throughout litigation and inform court decisions and precedent. Lar
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Can LLMs Reason in a Legally Meaningful Manner? A Small-scale Study on European Court of Human Rights Cases#1048777
- When Do LLMs Apply the Wrong Law? Diagnosing LLM Failures in Temporal Legal Reasoning#609048
- Exploring LLMs Applications in Law: A Literature Review on Current Legal NLP Approaches#479550
- Leveraging LLM agents and knowledge models for automated legal reasoning#1178520
- From Benchmarking to Reasoning: A Dual-Aspect, Large-Scale Evaluation of LLMs on Vietnamese Legal Text#31303
Record · ID 983333
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive