PhilArchive
open access
Epistemic Injustice and Suicide Claims
Reports of the intent to kill oneself are not always met with the credibility they deserve, with potentially fatal results. We recognise this as testimonial injustice, whereby a person’s testimony is not taken seriously due to a pervasive identity prejudice attached to the speaker (Fricker 2007). To meet the government’s ‘zero suicide ambition’ for mental health patients, we need to adopt epistemically just methods of evaluating suicide claims.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- “Me Too”: Epistemic Injustice and the Struggle for Recognition#742102
- Testimonial worth#759638
- Autonomy and Depression#762216
- Corrigendum to "Evaluating continuous identity cognitive therapy for veterans with a recent suicidal episode: An open-label group pilot study" [Contemp. Clin. Trials Commun. 48 (2025) 101576].#418271
- Common Ground, Conversational Roles and Epistemic Injustice#112645
Record · ID 98338
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive